Free sample - Christian Ethics. translation missing

Christian Ethics. Christian EthicsFirst of all the notion of Christian ethics should be defined. Christian ethics or moral teachings of Christianity, determines the moral compass of human behavior. Human behavior based on Christian ideas about the nature and destiny of man, his relationship with God. Christian ethics can be called a theory of Christian action. Ethics of Christianity Expressed in the Christian ethos, a certain style of life, diverse in its manifestations and peculiar   of individuals and large social groups of Christians. For me, ethics is limited to human relationships, with a view to equip the society so that all its members with a diversity of interests not to upset each other, but only the joy, and so that everyone can develop the right attitude to itself and its role in specific situations. [1] Throughout my life, I try to follow the moral principles taught by my parents and chosen by myself. I had not any religious upbringing, but think I know how to differ good and bad. As morally and ethically educated person I am able to keep such destructive emotions such as aggression, greed, boundless self-assertion, and try to guide them to safety to the public channel. All my principals that I follow I tried to put into the list and have got the following: concern for the welfare of others; respect the rights of others to be independent; reliability and honesty; voluntary submission to the law (with the exception of civil disobedience); fairness; rejection of an unfair advantage over others; philanthropy, the opportunity to benefit; prevention of harmful consequences. For example, professional associations have codes of ethics rules, which specify the desired behavior within the context of professional practice, such as medicine, law, accounting, engineering or forestry. I understand that these recorded in writing setting determine the default behavior, which is usually based on the principles of professional ethics. I have next ones: impartiality and objectivity; honesty, complete exposure; confidentiality; due diligence (duty of care); precise execution of professional duties; avoid potential or apparent conflicts. Lets’ analyze the notion of family ethics. In my understanding and according to my vision the concept of ethics in relation to the family used in the sense of morality, family, morality, and is regarded as an estimate breeding family members individually, and the moral climate of the family as a group. I think the brightest example of the qualities that I try to bring up is reflected in situation of family conflict. According to my principles I try never figure out family relationships with outsiders; make a stand for my loved ones, do not tell anybody about the facts, defaming my family, trying to stop a fit of anger, not to generalize and exaggerate, try to concede, not to clash over trifles. From the viewpoint of Unification, the relationship of people in society are the projection of the relationship between family members at home. For example, if there is a difference between people under the age of twenty or more years, their relationship must be characterized by love of older to younger, as their children, and the younger should respect their elders, as their parents. If the age difference is ten years or less, leading to love the younger men as their younger brothers or sisters, and younger - to respect their elders, as their older brothers or sisters. From this perspective, the family ethic is the foundation for all types of ethics. In transferring the family ethics in society, she turns into a social ethic, in transferring it to the corporation, it becomes a corporate ethics, in transferring it to the state it becomes a state ethics. Thanks to this, the true values have affirmed (virtues). In the state public figures must love his people, and people should respond to them respectfully. At school, teachers should love their children and their work, and students - respect their teachers. At the societal level senior must protect younger and younger - to respond to them respectfully. At the level of heads of institutions or enterprises should have a good lead subordinates, and subordinates - well follow the instructions of superiors. The love between brothers and sisters in the family, transferred to society, the state and the world, becomes the love of colleagues, neighbors, fellow citizens and humanity in general, in this love I try to   embody such horizontal values (virtues), as a peace-loving, tolerance, a sense of duty, loyalty, courtesy, humility, compassion, cooperation, service to the cause and understanding. However, today's society, the state and the world thrown into chaos. The reason for this is the weakening of the ethics of family relations, serving as the basis for all types of ethics. Consequently, the path to salvation lies through the public approval of a new family ethic, a new view of it. To accomplish this, we can save from destruction of the family, can save the world.[3] As I am a student of medical college (the clinical department), I can affirm that the ethics has its reflection on the process of teaching and studying at the college. Teacher on the faculty is also a physician. Therefore, what kind of physician he appears before the students, largely determines the ethics of the teaching process. There occur simultaneously paternalistic and partner relationships. Paternalistic - because the teacher gives what he knows, teaches skills that are owned. Ethical conflicts do not arise if the teacher knows a lot and can teach. In today's higher medical school it is becoming increasingly difficult to do. Each teacher comes out of this predicament in their own way: by virtue of his education, mastered teaching ethics, temperament and character. Learning process may be accompanied by violation of certain principles and norms of ethics and law. Another factor that reflects ethic norms in my studying is learning a subject of ethics on business classes. I have noticed that particular business ethics course shows us that this discipline can be â€Å"done† separately from management, finance or other sphere of business or studying. To my mind such idea\theory seems to be totally wrong. Every theory of business, we are familiar with during the learning process, contains elements and assumptions about what the role of humans in this theory, why it is necessary and what is a good result. Finally we can conclude that there are no ethically neutral theories or situations, they always contain some principles – moral or immoral, and they can never be free of them. So, during my classes I try to differentiate what is good or bad, how can I be successful together with my principles and Christian ethics norms. I believe I should follow the rules set in place by society (for the most part) and follow my conscious. I think mo st people know right and wrong, it is just a matter what they choose to do. Therefore it is wrong to think that in the learning process and in the business we can be taught any theory, and then add to them moral and ethical standards. They are already installed and we are entitled to choose one for ourselves in accordance with our beliefs. On our business ethics class we are taught basic qualities such as human dignity on one hand, and that any person is the part of the mechanism which provides profit and is a part of successful deal. [2] I think it is appropriate to say about professional ethics as a part of the process of studying ethics. Human activities are so diverse that the universal moral standards are often inadequate to regulate human behavior in specific areas of activity. Professional ethics refers to the implied or explicitly defined set of rules or codes of conduct that guide decision-makers in their various professional roles. This kind of role morality often provides beneficial effects on the resolution of ethical disputes arising in the course of professional activities. Most ethical dilemmas associated with different types of professional ethics, include some kind of contradiction between functionally differentiable and universal ethics. I have summarized my general principles and norms, based on degree of my beliefs: there is an ethical scale of human actions. Actions are good and bad, worthy and unworthy. Quality of a person is determined by what and how he's doing. Anyone who behaves with dignity, and respect is commendable, one who behaves in an unworthy manner is worth of censure, resentment and contempt; the good is natural and normal, the evil is random and unnatural. A decent man behaves adequately not because he is forced to some external factors, or hoped to receive from it any benefit, but simply because the opposite is unnatural and disgusting; there is justice. For good to yourself you should render the good, for evil - evil. Recompense good for evil (i.e. charity) is possible, but not as a rule, but as an exception to the rule. When applied to power relations: a violation of the law must be followed by punishment; there is a difference between "my" and "others". My (own family, own people, own country) - it is something for which I am responsible, something that I must take care, ha ving the duty to protect first and foremost, what is required to give preference to the "others". If we speak about the community, I believe that basic ethic norms here are: allowed everything that is not directly violating the rights of others; the rights of all people are equal. I try to follow them trough whole my life. Now educated man is a rarity in our daily lives, especially among young people who aspire only to the visual appeal. And yet these people are, and they are needed members of any company. Indeed, morally and spiritually strong person is very uncommon. To achieve maximum results and to become well-mannered person I learned from childhood. From the childhood parents brought me a sense of patriotism, love of family and, of course, good taste. This is best taught by own example that they did. In later years I took up self-education. I believe that self-education is the way to the formation of character, conscious development of valuable human qualities, and desire for self-education occurs only when there is a desire to achieve something, be useful to society, to become a person. The emphasis is on self-development, which leads, on the one hand, to achieving personal goals, and on the other hand, to "non-consumptiveness" towards others. Of course all the Christian imperatives amplified: "do not kill", "do not steal", "Do not lie," "sympathize and help others." And these basic facilities will not be violated in the name of God. I believe that people who live in my community are only looking out for themselves and I will do anything to get ahead, trying hard not to be involved with the community. I think the important thing for a modern society is the freedom of man and condemnation of violence and intolerance. Unlike religion, where justification for violence in the name of God is possible, modern morality rejects any violence and intolerance. Traditional society simply overwhelmed with immorality and lack of spirituality, including stringent violence against women and children, all dissenters and "violators of tradition." Modern morality requires a person to develop and achieve success with own efforts. But it does not say how to do it, only encouraging people to permanent seeking, to overcoming themselves and the voltage of their forces. Instead, modern morality gives a person the feeling that he was the creator of the future and one of the builders of himself and the entire world. In addition, self-development, increasing of professionalism leads to the attainment of wealth, gives prosperity in this life. Undo ubtedly, modern morality destroys many senseless rules and prohibitions, and in this sense makes life easier and more enjoyable. But at the same time modern morality imposes tough-to-person claim to be the person itself rather than go on about their own animal instincts or gregarious. This requires a manifestation of moral reason, but not primitive emotions such as aggression, revenge, and desire to subjugate others. And it is not easy just being tolerant, to overcome in yourself personal and public facilities. [4] As far as I believe in free will, morality, responsibility, and that man was created for interpersonal relationships, I make three assumptions: 1) the person is responsible to God 2) he is responsible to society 3) he is responsible to those who currently are in the relationship (to family or single person). Direct connection of ethics with the practice of life is clearly seen in the so-called professional ethics, which is a system of moral claims to professional activities of man, as was pointed earlier. One of the types of professional ethics is the ethics of business relationships. It emerged relatively late on the basis of the total labor morale. The business ethics takes place in the practice of business. It includes the ethics of management (management ethics), ethics of business communication, ethics of behavior, etc. I see two main viewpoints on the relation of universal ethical principles and business ethics: 1) the rules of conventional morality to business does not include or refer to a lesser extent. 2) business ethics based on universal ethical standards (to be honest, do no harm, keep one's word, etc.) that are specified in the light of a specific social role of business in society. Most of the tenets and norms that underlie the ethical culture of the modern economy, modern moral attitude toward work and business have its roots in the Protestant ethic. During the Reformation, the Western European countries have experienced important spiritual revolution, the essence of which was a new understanding of labor and wealth. According to representations of the ideologues of the Reformation of Luther and Calvin, work is not punishment, but divine vocation, destiny of man. The purpose of work is not redemption of sin and salvation from the sin of idleness, but the acquisition and multiplication of wealth, the accumulation of property, and the pursuit of profit. Rethinking the role of labour, along with the installation for maximum profit, financial success led to a new assessment of the role of property and wealth in human life. In the Protestant ethic property is important as a basis and foundation of individual liberty.[2] Many businessmen believe that their business can be considered as a concretization of the principles of Christian doctrine and Christian precepts. However, the rapid development of South-East Asia has clearly shown that, although the basis of people's lives in the East very different religious teachings and moral values of the market economy in general are common to all capitalist countries, irrespective of religious employers. Generally accepted ethical standards throughout the world are considered compliance with the sovereign immunity of private property, respect for the law, loyalty to a given word, the cult of fair competition, participation in charity events, providing credit, based on trust; scruples and concern for own reputation and the reputation of the firm, etc. I believe that independent choice of ethical standards and their degree of compliance in the business is a private affair of each individual. The problem of business ethics is now becoming more urgent. I will try to follow respect and trust of members of the company to each other based on social responsibility, transparency and good management. Subject of labor is central to Catholic social thought, as Church believes the work being central category of mankind. The reflection of the work of God is the work of people. Ethics of labor is that man finds his own dignity, strengthens the family and society. I strongly believe this thesis and hope that I will stay unshakeable in my principles. References   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Jerry Fleming. Profit at Any Cost? Baker Books, 2003.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Larry Burkett, Nelson Reference. Business by the book: The Complete Guide Of Biblical Principles For The Workplace. Updated edition, 1998.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   O.F. Williams and J. W. Houck. Full value: Cases in Christian business ethics, San Francisco, CA: Harper Row, 1978.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Todd Albertson. The Gods of Business: The Intersection of Faith and the Marketplace. Trinity Alumni Press, 2007.

How would you choose to direct Act 1 Scene 5 of Romeo and Juliet Essays

How would you choose to direct Act 1 Scene 5 of Romeo and Juliet Essays How would you choose to direct Act 1 Scene 5 of Romeo and Juliet Essay How would you choose to direct Act 1 Scene 5 of Romeo and Juliet Essay This scene starts with Capulet making his grand welcoming speech. I think that classical style music should be playing throughout this scene to show that this is a ballroom dance from the start. However, the music should quieten when the welcoming speech commences.The first line of this scene, Welcome, Gentlemen, should be shouted like an announcement. It should be a warm announcement with large outward hand movements signifying his welcoming of the guests to his premises and his dance. The actor portraying Capulet should be much exaggerated at this point, as he is at his happiest and wants the atmosphere to be cheery also.Once Capulets speech has concluded, he reminisces with his cousin about past times. This should be read to set the environment and activity in this scene. The lines,Tis more, tis more, his son is elder, sir; His son is thirty.Will you tell me that? His son was but a ward two years ago.These are vaguely showing that the atmosphere is friendly and the characters are looking back. It is setting the scene.This is until Romeo can be seen. He should be highlighted on the stage using lighting but whilst still being able to see the rest of the attendees clearly. This will help to show that he is not out of place and is fitting in, but will also help him stand out to the viewing audience. The actor however must also try to act differently to the other guests or even to avoid acting differently, and perhaps unnaturally, he could stand upstage to the party-goers. This would help the audience to see him and will show that he is supposed to be the focus of attention.Romeo should then spy Juliet, at which point the music playing in the background should change to a slower dance which is more romantic. This may help to mark the moment at which Romeo first sees Juliet and perhaps make it that much more important, even special. Romeo must almost be staring constantly at Juliet to show his memorisation at Juliets beauty. I think that when he wishes to talk to a nearby Servingman he should be clasping for his arm in order to get his attention, all the while his eyes still affixed upon Juliet. When he does speak his lines, What ladys that which doth enrich the hand of yonder knight? they should be spoken meaningfully and with enthusiastic passion. This will help to show that Romeo is completely taken aback by Juliet.The Servingmans reply, I know not, sir, could in fact be made to be quite humorous. He could disregard Romeos comment and could be more desperate to say anything to get himself away from the grasp of Romeos hand than answer his question. The servingman could then walk away quickly to the other side of the stage and serve other guests and then look back over to Romeo and shake his head in bemusement. This would be amusing and also emphasise how much Romeo is stupefied by Juliet to the extent that his behaviour has erratically changed since seeing her.Meanwhile, Juliet should be interacting (using mime) with friends. This would m ake the scene seems more natural. I think that she should then catch sight of Romeo and be startled by Romeo as he is by her. The gazing at each-other should last at least 10 seconds. They should be slowly spotlighted and slow music continuing in the background. This would add a touch of romance and passion to their first glimpse of each-other. Hopefully, this will show love at first sight. Another good idea to show how much they are overcome by each-other would be to have an obvious attention point such as a balloon popping. Everyone else could react to it apart from Romeo and Juliet. Little things like this, I believe, would increase the suspense and tension dramatically.Romeo can then make his heartfelt discourse. We know already that he will be dazzled by her beauty, but in his speech he compares her to the light and other bright images, such as in the hyperbole, O she doth teach the torches to burn bright. This suggests that her beauty and radiance itself can light up a room or perhaps even his heart. He feels that everyone else is insignificant compared to her, calling them crows compared to his Juliet who is a snowy dove. Crows tend to be vulgar, noisy birds, which convey images of darkness. Where as a dove again symbolises light but also heaven, purity and peace suggesting that he considers her to be a heavenly figure. This speech must be performed with eye contact between Romeo and Juliet at all times. This speech is very important to the play as it is the first time Romeo openly announces, to himself and the audience, how he feels about Juliet. Perhaps, Romeo could whisper parts of his speech in order to make his words sound a great deal more profound and add a certain amount of meaning.When Romeo is nearing the end of his speech Tybalt, Juliets cousin, and his Page should walk past Romeo and overhear the last couple of sentences of it. As he walks past he should look back at Romeo, and realise that after hearing these words that he is a Montague. He should look back and whisper his words, This, by his voice, should be a Montague. Fetch me my rapier, boy. These must be whispered so that Romeo cannot hear them, but I would also like Tybalt to have a hint of malice in his voice. Tybalt could also remove his mask and throw it down. This would benefit this moment because characteristically it is an act of anger and for the scene it will also let the watching audience visualise Tybalts facial expressions, which are also of anger. When Tybalts Page returns carrying his rapier Capulet must cut across his path.When Capulet sees an enraged Tybalt he asks, Why, how now, kinsman, wherefore storm you so? Capulet should be in complete contrast to Tybalt who is irate. Capulet must enter enjoying the party but must be curious to find out why Tybalt is so angry. When Tybalt explains, Uncle, this is a Montague, our foe, I think Capulets reaction should be quite mixed because he still needs a question answered; whether this is an older member of the family or if it is Romeo. Capulet should ask quickly, Young Romeo is it? this will clear up all doubt in Capulets mind and he can return to his original state as he entered. Tybalt answers him with, Tis he, that villain Romeo, this must be said spitefully with emphasis on the word villain. This will help the audience build up Tybalts character as a nasty man and yet remains loyal.Capulet has yet another monologue after Tybalt has made his point; however, this monologue is persuading Tybalt not to attack the likes of Romeo. Capulet calls him a portly gentleman who has well-governed youth. He does not see Romeo as a threat, unlike Tybalt. He then goes on to moan at Tybalt saying that he must show a fair presence and put off these frowns, and even calls him an ill-beseeming semblance for a feast. He must be getting rather annoyed with Tybalt, and this must be shown by the use of facial expressions and physical gestures.Tybalt disagrees with Capulets comments and goes on to say Ill not endure him. Capulet should snap his reply back to Tybalt by saying He shall be endured. Capulet would now be very aggressive with Tybalt for trying to overthrow his masters orders and using very forceful gestures such as looking straight down upon him and perhaps poking him in the chest. This will also show the power Capulet has over Tybalt. He insults him by calling him a goodman boy. This would be a double insult to Tybalt as he calling him a goodman which means not a gentleman, and to call him boy increases insult to the previous one. Tybalt must be astounded by the comment has made, as Capulet continues his orders.When Capulet has finished making his orders, Tybalt should nod and wait until Capulet has left. When Capulet leaves he should return back where he came from dancing happily. This will show that he really is not bothered about the presence of Romeo. Tybalt could then turn to his Page and say cunningly I will withdraw, but in this intrusion shall, now seeming sweet, convert to bittrest gall. Tybalt is being sneaky and his slyness must come across in his acting style. He can be rubbing his hands and still be looking through the crowd for Romeo.During Capulet and Tybalts conversation, Romeo should have manoeuvred his way over to the approximate location of Juliet. This would look more realistic if he has danced his way over to her, but still must be deliberately staring at Juliet for the amount of time it takes for the conversation to take place. So, once the conversation has ended, Juliet will catch sight of Romeo as she is dancing. Romeo, should smile at her, and receive a smile in return from Juliet. Romeo must make a beckoning gesture with his finger. The music should stop hear and Juliet should signal to her partner that she is tired and needs to have a rest. She should make her way over to Romeo. Romeo should grab her hand, almost whisking her off her feet and whisper, from behind, into her ear. He begins If I profane with my unworthiest h and, this holy shrine, the gentle sin is this, My lips two blushing pilgrims, ready stand to smooth that rough touch with a gentle kiss. He must say these lines as a whisper so that he sounds romantic and will entice Juliet. Juliet, once hearing this should turn to him and smile coyly.There appears to be a degree of teasing in Juliets response, For saints have hands that pilgrims hands do touch, and palm to palm is holy palmers kiss, but Romeo is adamant that he wants a kiss from the person he now loves suggesting that if he was to kiss her and she was not to return it then it would not be a sin. Religious imagery plays a big role in this speech, words such as palm, conveying images of Palm Sunday, touching and intimacy or even prayer which suggests communication and worship are used several times. Romeo speaks to Juliet as though she was a saint, making us think once again of purity and perfection. To Romeo she is a shrine, a place of worship and focus that is now in his life. He m ust look at her as if she is from the heavens, as the ideas are already in the script. Due to the irresistibility both characters feel towards each other they should act with a certain degree of restraint and control this would explain the formal language they both use which is understandable as it is the first time they meet. They speak alternately to one another in polite courteous language and accept the adoration and devotion of the other.They must go on until they both become very passionate with each-other, Juliet says Saints do not move, though grant for prayers sake. Romeo answers,Then move not while my prayers effect I take. Thus from my lips, by thine, my sin is purged. They will then kiss. The kiss must be very passionate and yet must be discrete from Juliets family and she must be sure that no-one can see her. They kiss and soon after Romeo obliges to have his sin again. They kiss once more. They should gaze at each-other in awe.The nurse of the Capulets enters and sees Romeo and Juliet kissing, she may tap Juliet on the shoulder, and Juliet would react startled. The Nurses first line in this scene is one of the most important lines in the scene, if not the play. She says Madam, your mother craves a word with you. Romeo knows that he is attending a Capulet dance, and soon queries why she has her mother in attendance also. Romeo asks,What is her mother? Romeo should be in shock when he hears,Her mother is the lady of the house. His eyes should widen and he must swallow exaggeratedly as he comes to term with the full reality of the situation.The nurse takes Juliet away with her, and Romeo is left distraught. He must be pitied by the audience when he says Is she a Capulet? O dear account! my life is my foes debt. He must walk away and yet still try to catch a last glimpse of Juliet at any opportunity. As he is about to reach the door Capulet stops him and invites him to a trifling foolish banquet, but Romeo must whisper in his ear. The whisper must be unheard to the audience. Capulet thanks Romeo for coming and lets him go on his way. The rest exit the stage apart from Juliet and the Nurse.Juliet is curious to find out the name of the person she has fallen in love with. Come hither, Nurse. What is yond gentleman? When the Nurse replies it would look good to have the same expression from Juliet as seen on Romeo when he found out the identity of Juliet. When the nurse says that his name is Romeo, and a Montague Juliet should collapse over a nearby banister and cry out her rhyme:My only love sprung from my only hate!Too early seen unknown, and known too late!Prodigious birth to love it is to me,That I must love a loathà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½d enemy.This rhyme is spoken sombrely and after the Nurse assists Juliet away from the empty hall. She is heartbroken and this should be evident. The Nurse must be trying to console Juliet as the two exit the scene.

Humes Dialogues Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Humes Dialogues - Essay Example I agree with Philo to the extent that he suggests that God has infinite attributes which cannot be compared with those of man, but I disagree with his assertion that we can infer nothing about the nature of the designer of nature. In my view, I think that experience plays a significant role in informing us that God has infinite attributes similar to the intelligence and mind of human beings. While is true that God has infinite attributes, there is no reason to suppose that such attributes are similar in nature to the mind and intelligence of human beings. Even though their dissimilarities in various designs of human creatures and animals, that does not mean that they are completely obscure. The dissimilarity between the designs of two human beings does not mean that those human beings are different; they are both human beings with human intelligence and the human mind. In the same way, the dissimilarity in terms of divine nature between the design of God and human beings does not mea n they are different; they both have a similar mind and intelligence. Therefore, I agree with Cleanthes that God exists and that he resembles human mind and intelligence. A theist would respond to the challenge of Philo by suggesting that God created human beings to be similar to him; so God resembles human beings. While I agree with theists in existence of a divine God who resembles a human being, I would object their story of creation which suggests that God created human beings to become similar to him.